Since my previous signature apparently offended someone, I tough I should make an aproval thread before puting another one.
How is it?
| Psypoke http://forums.psypokes.com/forums/ |
|
| Sig testing. Is this different enough? http://forums.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=21145 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Bumi [ Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Sig testing. Is this different enough? |
Since my previous signature apparently offended someone, I tough I should make an aproval thread before puting another one.
How is it? |
|
| Author: | gamer guy [ Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Is it supposed to go against evolution or agree with it. It shows a lizard evolving into a bird and then says something about lies. Or did I just look at it totally wrong? |
|
| Author: | Bumi [ Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Its supoused to be anti-creationism. I know is kind of inaccurate, but it still funny. |
|
| Author: | bluebell_rose [ Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sig testing. Is this different enough? |
Actually due to recent studies it's not incorrect Avians are now classified as a sub phyla of Phyla Repetilia. Avians evolved from reptiles so what you have is biolgically correct. |
|
| Author: | Kurushel [ Sat Feb 23, 2008 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sig testing. Is this different enough? |
Given that creationists don't believe birds came from reptiles, the image doesn't make much sense. If you're comfortable with having a non-sensical, contradictory image in your signature, then go for it. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|