|
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:55 am
|
Trubbish, Garbodor, Vanillite, Vanillish, and Vanilluxe
Trubbish, Garbodor, Vanillite, Vanillish, and Vanilluxe
Author |
Message |
filter
Pokemon Trainer
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 4:46 pm Posts: 28
|
I like them hating is stupid man
|
Tue May 07, 2013 5:04 pm |
|
|
GhostPony750
Pokemon Master
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:00 pm Posts: 1161 Location: Montréal
|
filter wrote: I like them hating is stupid man Oh no another one... What's wrong with not liking something? We all have our own tastes and opinions on something.
_________________Thanks DragoBoy for this awesome sig and Mektar for the astonishing avatar!!!
|
Tue May 07, 2013 5:21 pm |
|
|
DNA
Trivia Champion
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:37 pm Posts: 3170 Location: clegavel
|
Quote: My comment about Vanilluxe and all them being ice cream cones was not meant to be literal. I know they're not really ice cream cones, I'm sure they're... whatever in the anime. I was speaking metaphorically. And going over the comments, I can see how that may been misinterpreted. And I also want to say that I have nothing against them as Pokémon. I'm sure they're excellent battlers. I was simply saying they look ridiculous, judging them not by what's on the inside, but rather by what's on the outside. That makes everything okay. I'm not sure if judging them based on just the outside makes everything "okay" per se, although I get where you're coming from. And yeah, just saying "Vanilluxe/Garbodor is stupid because it's an ice cream sundae/trash bag" with little follow-up does come off as harsh, hence my reaction in the beginning. And I'm totally willing to drop this back-and-forth if you are.
|
Tue May 07, 2013 5:24 pm |
|
|
Charphlokenapoar
Dragon Tamer
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:33 pm Posts: 124 Location: Right behind you
|
I was being sarcastic right there, saying that it was okay. "Oh, I don't care about the real you, all that matters is what's on the outside!" I think I once heard it on MADtv or something.
_________________If you were offended by my post, just know that I was probably kidding. Probably...
|
Tue May 07, 2013 9:45 pm |
|
|
DNA
Trivia Champion
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:37 pm Posts: 3170 Location: clegavel
|
(Ah. Sarcasm doesn't transfer well over the internet. That, and it's very difficult for me to detect it to begin with.)
|
Tue May 07, 2013 9:52 pm |
|
|
Guardian1239
Pokemon Trainer
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:26 pm Posts: 47
|
GhostPony750 wrote: Actually... there is too much details on new Pokemon. And when there's too much details on something, it looks horrible, like what happened to today's cars. (Talking about you, Toyota.) This has to do with the advances in technology. Generation I was very limited on details because of the limitations of the software. Also, details look well when done correctly. I'd be more comfortable if you said that you didn't like certain details because generally disliking details seems close-minded considering how many details there are in the natural world. There's nothing wrong with preferring games with simpler graphics, but what you said struck me as very strange. o_O Disregarding the arguments in this thread, I think Trubbish is cute. :3 I disliked the new Pokemon when I first saw them, as I did for the recently released Generation VI Pokemon. We really need to stop, step back, and just accept things for what they are. Being angry about a Pokemon design won't change anything; all it will do is cause you to be angry or upset or irritated. Just go with the flow and enjoy your favorites.
|
Wed May 15, 2013 10:12 pm |
|
|
Arekasune
Dragon Tamer
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:17 am Posts: 100 Location: Boise, Idaho
|
I've often found that it takes me a while to become accustomed to a new gens' pokemon, especially with Gen 5. It took me a very long time to start to really enjoy some of them aesthetically, and the same thing will most likely happen with the new gen as well.
...Not really sure what my point was, and I still don't like the design of Trubbish/Vanilluxe lines, but sometimes patience and keeping a cool head can improve your experience in games like these. /shrug
_________________ ''I believe that humanity's goal should not be complete victory, but rather a certain demeanor, an attitude, towards fighting.''~~Treize Khush-Renada
|
Wed May 15, 2013 10:35 pm |
|
|
Charphlokenapoar
Dragon Tamer
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:33 pm Posts: 124 Location: Right behind you
|
Arekasune wrote: I've often found that it takes me a while to become accustomed to a new gens' pokemon, especially with Gen 5. It took me a very long time to start to really enjoy some of them aesthetically, and the same thing will most likely happen with the new gen as well.
...Not really sure what my point was, and I still don't like the design of Trubbish/Vanilluxe lines, but sometimes patience and keeping a cool head can improve your experience in games like these. /shrug As I have been playing, I've noticed this as well. Before I played Black, I wasn't real pleased with Tepig and some of the others (like Trubbish/Vanillite, for example). I thought Chandelure was weird, as well, simply because it was a chandelier. But as I've put some play time into it, Chandelure has evolved (see what I did there?) into one of my teammates that I would not replace for all the Pokédollars in the world! Although that may be because Pokédollars have no real value... but that's beside the point!
_________________If you were offended by my post, just know that I was probably kidding. Probably...
|
Wed May 15, 2013 10:39 pm |
|
|
Thebluepik1
Dragon Tamer
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:57 pm Posts: 121 Location: Eating pasta in norhtern Italy~ with Doitsu
|
Whoa, whoa, WAIT A MINUTE! WAIT A F*CKING MINUTE! Unova haters. What's wrong with a little creativity? Granted, Vanillite is ice cream, but that is creative! And Garbodor? Ripped open trash bags with pipe cleaner arms. That is creative. Muk, Koffing, and Voltorb. Not creative. They are puddles of sludge, balls of gas, and Pokéballs, respectively. People never understand that. I feel better now after yelling at you guys.
|
Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:38 pm |
|
|
Kiga
Ace Trainer
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:28 am Posts: 421 Location: Dayton, Ohio
|
Thebluepik1 wrote: Whoa, whoa, WAIT A MINUTE! WAIT A F*CKING MINUTE! Unova haters. What's wrong with a little creativity? Granted, Vanillite is ice cream, but that is creative! And Garbodor? Ripped open trash bags with pipe cleaner arms. That is creative. Muk, Koffing, and Voltorb. Not creative. They are puddles of sludge, balls of gas, and Pokéballs, respectively. People never understand that. I feel better now after yelling at you guys. Language! There are (probably) children here! Anyway, the difference between Grimer and Trubbish and Voltorb and Vanillite is that Grimer and Voltorb are the originals. Does that necessarily make them any better conceptually? No. But they have more history. Truthfully, Gen I veterans shouldn't have too much issue with Trubbish and Vanillite because they do fall into a similar line of originality that quite a few of the original pokemon had. If they do, it seems more likely to me that it stems in part from the Genwunner idea that each generation is progressively less original than the first. But. Even if they despise Garbodor and adore Magneton, simply for the sake of originality and nothing else, then that is their prerogative, and in no way makes them a hater, which is quite a disgusting word because it puts fear and shame into having your own opinion, simply because other people don't agree with you. You say that Trubbish and Vanillite are original, and then turn around and rib into Koffing, Grimer, and Voltorb for being unoriginal. That may be your opinion, but isn't that just a tad hypocritical? In my opinion, this entire argument over the originality of Trubbish and Vanillite is just foolish. It is, if for originality's sake, a Genwunner mindset, but it's still their opinion, which is a right that they have. It's when people make a big deal over it that it becomes an issue, because it only leads to ridiculous arguments over it.
|
Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:43 pm |
|
|
Thebluepik1
Dragon Tamer
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:57 pm Posts: 121 Location: Eating pasta in norhtern Italy~ with Doitsu
|
Kiga wrote: Thebluepik1 wrote: Whoa, whoa, WAIT A MINUTE! WAIT A F*CKING MINUTE! Unova haters. What's wrong with a little creativity? Granted, Vanillite is ice cream, but that is creative! And Garbodor? Ripped open trash bags with pipe cleaner arms. That is creative. Muk, Koffing, and Voltorb. Not creative. They are puddles of sludge, balls of gas, and Pokéballs, respectively. People never understand that. I feel better now after yelling at you guys. Language! There are (probably) children here! Anyway, the difference between Grimer and Trubbish and Voltorb and Vanillite is that Grimer and Voltorb are the originals. Does that necessarily make them any better conceptually? No. But they have more history. Truthfully, Gen I veterans shouldn't have too much issue with Trubbish and Vanillite because they do fall into a similar line of originality that quite a few of the original pokemon had. If they do, it seems more likely to me that it stems in part from the Genwunner idea that each generation is progressively less original than the first. But. Even if they despise Garbodor and adore Magneton, simply for the sake of originality and nothing else, then that is their prerogative, and in no way makes them a hater, which is quite a disgusting word because it puts fear and shame into having your own opinion, simply because other people don't agree with you. You say that Trubbish and Vanillite are original, and then turn around and rib into Koffing, Grimer, and Voltorb for being unoriginal. That may be your opinion, but isn't that just a tad hypocritical? In my opinion, this entire argument over the originality of Trubbish and Vanillite is just foolish. It is, if for originality's sake, a Genwunner mindset, but it's still their opinion, which is a right that they have. It's when people make a big deal over it that it becomes an issue, because it only leads to ridiculous arguments over it. Well, this is true. And sorry about that. I'm truly sorry. I've been talking with my friend "Japan" about how people seem to dislike Unova Pokémon more than most other generations. I'm very sorry.
|
Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:33 am |
|
|
Frost
THE POWER IS ON!
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:29 am Posts: 1581 Location: Purple Ranger
|
A tangentially related rant to the topic at hand: these sweeping generalized statements are so overdone and tiresome. "You say Unova sucks, but Kanto had bad Pokemon too!!!" Like, why is that the go-to argument for every Unova defender ever? Who said anything about Kanto, or claimed that every single one of its Pokemon serves as a shining beacon of creativity and originality? Who said anything about the quality of Trubbish compared to Grimer? It's so UGH that this fanbase has to defend their favorites by pointing out that other things suck too and Kanto gets the brunt of everyone's wrath these days for being the first. I prefer to defend Unova by pointing out the sheer number of new Pokemon available, how there was a variety of animals and interesting new type combinations, how steps were taken to make Bug a better type and stuff like that.
Also, how is Vanillite creative for being ice cream but Koffing isn't creative for being a naval mine? They're literally both Pokemon based on inanimate objects.
|
Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:45 am |
|
|
Thebluepik1
Dragon Tamer
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:57 pm Posts: 121 Location: Eating pasta in norhtern Italy~ with Doitsu
|
Ehh... This is, uh, true... *gulp*
Thebluepik1 has left the conversation...
|
Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:15 am |
|
|
vaporterra
Ace Trainer
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:42 pm Posts: 443 Location: North America
|
Quote: A tangentially related rant to the topic at hand: these sweeping generalized statements are so overdone and tiresome. "You say Unova sucks, but Kanto had bad Pokemon too!!!" Like, why is that the go-to argument for every Unova defender ever? Who said anything about Kanto, or claimed that every single one of its Pokemon serves as a shining beacon of creativity and originality? Who said anything about the quality of Trubbish compared to Grimer? It's so UGH that this fanbase has to defend their favorites by pointing out that other things suck too and Kanto gets the brunt of everyone's wrath these days for being the first. The reason people who are defensive against the Unova hate target Kanto is to counter the Genwunners, as opposed to saying Johto or Hoenn (even Sinnoh, although some people would group Sinnoh with Unova as one of the newer regions). So it's nothing against Kanto but just the genwunners.
|
Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:26 pm |
|
|
Haunted Water
Pokemon Master
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:01 pm Posts: 2281 Location: In your house, nunchuking all of your shit.
|
I just noticed this thread's existence, so allow me to beat an already dead horse by saying that bashing an evolution line when you haven't even played the frickin game they come from is bad. It pretty much voids your argument, as you have only primary resources and no first-hand account. I don't necesarily like Sigilyph or Golurk, but I still respect them as powerhouses. If you're going to hate on something, at least do some good research before forming an argument.
_________________ "As I look up from the ground I see darkness all around And I'm lost but can be found up in the sky Goodbye"
|
Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:58 pm |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|